AIは健康な街づくりの「助言者」になれるか? ―ChatGPTの助言180件を倫理面から検証、住民参加・人による監督への配慮に課題―

20206-09-25 北陸先端科学技術大学院大学,早稲田大学

北陸先端科学技術大学院大学(JAIST)と早稲田大学の研究グループは、健康を支える都市環境づくりについて、ChatGPTが生成した助言180件を倫理的観点から検証した。身体活動、食生活、社会的交流、大気汚染、交通安全・犯罪、騒音の6テーマについて、所得水準や予算条件を変えた質問を設定し、「非加害」「分配的正義」「集合的参加」「透明性のある監督」の4基準で評価した。その結果、明らかに有害な提案はなく、所得の低い地域を不当に扱う傾向も少なかった。一方、住民参加は60.6%、人による監督は75.6%にとどまり、特に予算制約下で低下した。研究は、LLMを都市計画の初期的な情報源として利用する際にも、専門家の判断、住民参加、人による監督を組み込む必要性を示している。

<関連情報>

健康を支える都市環境のデザインに関する大規模言語モデル生成助言文の倫理的評価 Ethical assessment of large language model-generated advisory text on designing the built environment for health

Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Becky P.Y. Loo, Jing Zhao, Jiuling Li, Ying Long, Yi Lu, Koichiro Oka, Andrew T. Kaczynski
Developments in the Built Environment  Available online: 10 August 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2026.101007

Highlights

  • This paper examines ethical properties of LLMs in urban design advice for health.
  • LLMs produced non-maleficent health solutions across diverse income contexts.
  • Human judgment is essential in urban health strategies informed by LLMs.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can generate advisory text on modifying built environments to support health. This study examined the ethical properties of a recent LLM generating text on built environments to support health. The prompts covered six health-related pathways in higher-income, lower-income, and mixed-income neighbourhoods. Overall, 180 answers were coded against four ethical criteria. Non-maleficence was satisfied in all answers. Lower-income contexts were rarely offered weaker proposals than higher-income contexts. Reference to collective participation and transparent oversight appeared in 70-90% of answers without a budget constraint, but only 30-50% under one. The LLM more consistently met minimum expectations for harm avoidance and distributive justice than for collective participation and transparent oversight. These findings suggest that current LLM outputs may reproduce some baseline ethical conventions in urban design discourse but are less reliable on procedural concerns. LLM-generated outputs should therefore be interpreted cautiously within existing built environment decision-making processes.

1603情報システム・データ工学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました