COP30に向けた各国の気候目標に関する研究(COP30: Study reveals “highest possible ambition” for countries’ climate pledges)

2025-11-06 インペリアル・カレッジ・ロンドン(ICL)

インペリアル・カレッジ・ロンドンの研究チームは、各国の気候公約(NDC)がパリ協定で求められる「最高限度の野心(Highest Possible Ambition)」を満たしているかを定量的に評価する新枠組みを提案した。枠組みは「国内的努力」「国際的整合性」「実施可能性」の3本柱で構成され、各国が自国能力に基づき公平で実行可能な削減目標を設定しているかを判定する。国際司法裁判所の勧告を踏まえ、気候行動は「注意義務(due diligence)」として法的責任を伴うことを明示。現行のNDCは1.5°C目標達成に大きく不足しており、この枠組みを適用することで透明性と説明責任を強化できるとした。成果はEnvironmental Research Letters誌に掲載。

<関連情報>

パリ協定第4条に基づく国家決定貢献における可能な限り高い野心を評価するための枠組み A framework to assess highest possible ambition in nationally determined contributions under Article 4 of the Paris Agreement

Julia Katharina Schönfeld and Joeri Rogelj
Environmental Research Letters  Published: 6 November 2025
DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ae15aa

COP30に向けた各国の気候目標に関する研究(COP30: Study reveals “highest possible ambition” for countries’ climate pledges)

Abstract

Collective progress towards meeting the Paris Agreement’s long-term temperature goal (LTTG) remains insufficient, a shortfall to be addressed by new Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The Agreement stipulates that countries’ NDCs will represent a progression and reflect their highest possible ambition (HPA). However, the vague conceptualisation of this HPA norm challenges its translation into practice, allowing states to reference ambition in their NDC without clear evidence. Recently, the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) advisory opinion on climate change provided clarification regarding this norm. The level of ambition communicated in an NDC is not entirely left to the discretion of states but must constitute an adequate contribution to the collective achievement of the global temperature goal. States are obliged to exercise due diligence to ensure their NDCs reflect their best efforts. Building on the ICJ’s interpretative guidance, we propose a structured framework to operationalise the HPA norm and reflect upon considerations of ambition in countries’ NDCs. The framework’s core pillars incorporate domestic, international, and implementation considerations in NDCs, elaborated upon in two elements per pillar. Under domestic considerations, NDCs should be based on a faithful assessment of mitigation options utilising national capabilities. International considerations require contributions that adequately support the LTTG while balancing equity. Implementation considerations demand that NDCs account for the co-impact of the measures considered and be actionable in the near term to ensure ambition is translated into action. The Paris Agreement-HPA Framework can support transparent communication of the conditions under which more ambitious targets can be pursued. We apply the framework to explore the engagement of current NDCs with the framework’s elements. Finally, the framework empowers societal stakeholders to interrogate, verify and, when necessary, challenge whether NDC preparations were carried out with due diligence, supporting accountability in global and national climate action.

1900環境一般
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました