地球システムモデルのGPPシミュレーションの不正確さが陸上炭素吸収量の推定に脅威(Researchers Discover Earth System Models’ Inaccurate GPP Simulations Threaten Land Carbon Uptake Estimates)

2025-09-03 中国科学院(CAS)

中国科学院の研究チームは、地球システムモデル(ESM)が陸上生態系による二酸化炭素吸収を評価する上で重要な指標「総一次生産量(GPP)」を正確に再現できていないと報告した。GPPは光合成による炭素固定速度であり、温度が最適閾値(Topt)を超えると急速に低下する。しかし解析の結果、現在のESMは60.3%の生態系でToptを過大評価または捉え損ねており、とくに乾燥地域で顕著だった。また過去40年間に観測されたToptの上昇(高温への生態系の順応)をモデルは再現できていない。原因は、水分制約や植生構造変化の表現不足にあり、その結果、温暖化がもたらす炭素吸収効果を過大に見積もり、気候変動予測に偏りを生じさせている。本研究は、Toptの扱いの改善が、炭素循環予測の信頼性向上や国際的な気候変動緩和策の基盤強化につながることを示した。

<関連情報>

地球システムモデルにおける全球植生生産性の最適温度に関する誤った表現 Misrepresented optimum temperatures for global vegetation productivity in Earth system models

Yiheng Wang ∙ Jianyang Xia ∙ Yuanyuan Huang ∙ Chenyu Bian ∙ Shuli Niu
One Earth  Published:September 2, 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101428

Graphical abstract

地球システムモデルのGPPシミュレーションの不正確さが陸上炭素吸収量の推定に脅威(Researchers Discover Earth System Models’ Inaccurate GPP Simulations Threaten Land Carbon Uptake Estimates)

Science for society

Land ecosystems absorb carbon from the atmosphere, slowing down climate change. Scientists and policymakers depend on Earth system models (ESMs) to estimate how much carbon ecosystems can absorb in the future, which is vital for climate policy, carbon budgeting, and land management strategies. However, the rate of carbon uptake, known as gross primary productivity (GPP), is strongly influenced by temperature and can decline once it exceeds an optimum level (⁢⁢⁢⁢). In this study, we found that ESMs overestimate ⁢⁢⁢⁢ and fail to capture its increase over time, particularly in dry and cold ecosystems. These biases suggest that models may overestimate the positive effects of warming on land carbon uptake, highlighting the need to better capture the complex ecological processes that regulate GPP under high temperatures. Improving the model representation of ⁢⁢⁢⁢ and ecosystem-scale responses to rising temperatures is critical not only for reliable climate projections but also for sustaining ecosystem functions and services that benefit nature and human society and informing decision-making and international efforts to mitigate climate change.

Highlights

  • ESMs overestimate optimum temperature (⁢⁢⁢⁢) for GPP in 60.3% of land ecosystems
  • ESMs underestimate the increase in ⁢⁢⁢⁢ under climate change
  • ⁢⁢⁢⁢⁢⁢⁢⁢reveals key model bias in vegetation structure and water limitations
  • ESMs need better incorporation of temperature acclimation for GPP prediction

Summary

Accurately predicting the responses of gross primary productivity (GPP) to warming is essential for constraining the global carbon cycle and its feedback to climate change. GPP increases with temperature but declines beyond a threshold, known as the ecosystem optimum temperature (⁢⁢⁢⁢). A realistic representation of ⁢⁢⁢⁢ is therefore crucial for reliable projections of GPP and terrestrial carbon uptake. However, whether current Earth system models (ESMs) capture ⁢⁢⁢⁢ remains unclear. Here, we evaluated ESMs’ representation of ⁢⁢⁢⁢ and its temporal trends using ground observations and remote-sensing products from 1982 to 2013. We found that ESMs overestimated or failed to capture ⁢⁢⁢⁢ across 60.3% of ecosystems, especially in arid regions, due to misrepresented water limitations and vegetation structure changes under high temperatures. Furthermore, ESMs underestimated the observed temporal increase in ⁢⁢⁢⁢, indicating their limited capacity to replicate ecosystem temperature acclimation. These findings reveal significant uncertainties in GPP projections and offer critical insights to improve carbon-climate feedback predictions.

1702地球物理及び地球化学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました