森林炭素市場が気候変動リスクを過小評価(Carbon markets underestimate the risks U.S. forests face from climate change)

2026-05-20 カリフォルニア大学サンタバーバラ校(UCSB)

米国のUniversity of California, Santa Barbaraの研究チームは、森林由来カーボンクレジット市場が、気候変動による米国森林のリスクを過小評価していると指摘した。研究では、森林火災、干ばつ、害虫被害などの気候リスクを長期モデルで解析した結果、多くの森林炭素吸収量が将来的に維持できない可能性が示された。現在の炭素市場制度では、森林が長期間炭素を固定し続ける前提でクレジットが発行されているが、実際には気候変動により炭素貯蔵が急速に失われる危険が高まっている。研究チームは、既存のリスク評価モデルが気候変動の不確実性を十分反映していないとし、より厳格なリスク補正や長期監視が必要だと提言した。この成果は、森林保全政策や炭素取引制度、気候変動対策の信頼性向上に重要な示唆を与える。

<関連情報>

森林炭素プロトコルは、気候変動による炭素損失リスクを過小評価している Forest carbon protocols underestimate climate-driven carbon loss risks

Chao Wu,Grayson Badgley,Michael L. Goulden,James T. Randerson,Anna T. Trugman,Jonathan A. Wang,Linqing Yang,Nezha Acil,Susan C. Cook-Patton,Danny Cullenward,Steven J. Davis,Christopher A. Williams & William R. L. Anderegg
Nature  Published:20 May 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10571-y

森林炭素市場が気候変動リスクを過小評価(Carbon markets underestimate the risks U.S. forests face from climate change)

Abstract

Although the reduction of fossil fuel emissions remains of the utmost importance to mitigate climate change, maintaining and enhancing carbon sinks in forests have been widely promoted as nature-based climate solutions1,2,3,4. However, disturbances that could result in losses of forest carbon stocks are poorly accounted for when estimating the potential role of forests in climate mitigation5,6,7. This makes it difficult to appropriately size ‘buffer pools’: a mechanism designed to compensate for unintended carbon losses in carbon crediting projects8,9. Here we use forest inventory, satellite data, disturbance modelling and machine learning to map reversal (carbon loss) risk in the contiguous United States (CONUS) from natural disturbance. Across CONUS forests, we show that climate change increases the 100-year risk of carbon losses from natural disturbance, particularly in California and the Intermountain West. The current buffer pool of the largest CONUS forest climate mitigation programme is likely too small by an average factor of 6.3, and this could range from 2.2- to 8.0-fold too small when considering uncertainties around future climate scenarios, disturbance severity and other carbon pools. We provide spatially explicit maps of the long-term risks to forest carbon losses from natural disturbances, which highlight that current methodologies used for constructing carbon offset buffer pools require revisions to succeed under climate change.

1904環境影響評価
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました