鶏飼料の栄養分布の指標を発見(Key indicator signals nutrient distribution in chicken feed, researchers report)

2025-10-30 ペンシルベニア州立大学(Penn State)

ペンシルベニア州立大学(Penn State)の研究チームは、ブロイラー鶏舎での飼料供給ラインにおける栄養分布の偏りが鶏の成長や健康に与える影響を調査した。結果、飼料中のアミノ酸密度のばらつきが体重増加率、飼料効率、胸肉歩留まり、骨の強度に顕著な影響を及ぼす一方、酵素フィターゼ活性(Phytase Activity)は影響がほとんどないことが判明。アミノ酸密度が高い飼料を与えた群では成長効率と肉質が向上した。研究者は、鶏舎前後でのペレット破損や供給ラインの長さが栄養の不均一を生み、群全体の成長ばらつきにつながると指摘。したがって、飼料品質評価ではアミノ酸密度を主要指標とすることが有効であると結論づけた。成果は『Journal of Applied Poultry Research』に掲載。

<関連情報>

農場における適切な栄養分離マーカーとしてのフィターゼ活性とアミノ酸密度の評価:ブロイラーの成績、加工歩留まり、および骨のミネラル化への影響 Evaluating phytase activity and amino acid density as suitable on-farm nutrient segregation markers: Effects on broiler performance, processing yields, and bone mineralization

B.S. Liebross, D.R. Boontarue, C.M. Poholsky, J.W. Boney
Journal of Applied Poultry Research  Available online: 22 August 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2025.100594

SUMMARY

Pellet quality and feed line length influence the nutrient density in feed pans throughout poultry houses. Reported variability in amino acid density (AAD) and phytase activity (PhyAct) along feed lines prompted this investigation. The objectives were to determine the impact of nutrient segregation, as measured in a controlled field trial, on broiler performance, processing yields, and bone mineralization in a replicated pen trial. Dietary treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial in a randomized complete block design. Ross 308 male broilers were provided diets varying in AAD (95 % and 105 % of recommendation) and PhyAct (250, 500, 750 FTU/kg) from d11-38. Experimental diets were given full nutrient release credit for phytase at 500 FTU/kg; however, the phytase was withheld at the mill. Liquid phytase was later mixed into diets to create the PhyAct levels. Broiler performance and bone mineralization were measured from d11-38 while processing yields were determined on d39. The main effects of AAD and PhyAct did not interact (P > 0.05). However, broilers fed excess AAD improved d38 BW by 121 g, overall FCR by 0.077, and breast yield by 1.056 % compared to those fed reduced AAD (P < 0.05). Conversely, the main effect of PhyAct did not affect measured parameters (P > 0.05). While variability in both AAD and PhyAct can be identified in the field, these data demonstrated that AAD is a suitable marker for nutrient segregation that impacts performance. The lack of broiler performance differences makes PhyAct (500 FTU/kg dose) a poor nutrient segregation marker.

1201畜産
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました