一般家庭の空気汚染が屋外より高い可能性を示唆 (Air pollution levels may be higher inside your home than outside)

ad

2025-02-13 バーミンガム大学

バーミンガム大学の研究チームは、低コストのセンサーと革新的な手法を用いて、屋内の微小粒子状物質(PM)濃度が屋外よりも高く、変動が大きいことを明らかにしました。3軒の住宅を2週間にわたり調査した結果、1軒では9日間にわたり世界保健機関(WHO)のPM2.5の24時間基準値を超える日がありました。この研究は、屋内空気質の家庭ごとのモニタリングの重要性を示しています。PM濃度の差異は、住宅の立地、換気状況、居住者の活動パターンなどに起因しており、屋内空気質の複雑さを示しています。研究者たちは、非負値行列因子分解(NMF)という手法を用いて、屋内のPMレベルをより正確にモデル化し、低コストで詳細な汚染レベルの把握を可能にしました。このアプローチは、英国全土およびそれ以外の地域の家庭での空気質管理に応用でき、より正確な汚染曝露モデルや公衆衛生政策の策定に貢献すると期待されています。

<関連情報>

低コストセンサーを用いて複数の住宅に共通する大気汚染源を評価する Using low-cost sensors to assess common air pollution sources across multiple residences

Catrin J. Rathbone,Dimitrios Bousiotis,Owain G. Rose & Francis D. Pope
Scientific Reports  Published:13 January 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85985-1

一般家庭の空気汚染が屋外より高い可能性を示唆 (Air pollution levels may be higher inside your home than outside)

Abstract

The rapid development of low-cost sensors provides the opportunity to greatly advance the scope and extent of monitoring of indoor air pollution. In this study, calibrated particle matter (PM) sensors and a non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) source apportionment technique are used to investigate PM concentrations and source contributions across three households in an urban residential area. The NMF is applied to combined data from all houses to generate source profiles that can be used to understand how PM source characteristics are similar or differ between different households in the same urban area. PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in all three houses were greater, more variable, and significantly different to ambient concentrations recorded at a nearby ambient monitoring site. Concentrations were also significantly different between houses, with the World Health Organisation 24-h guideline limits for PM2.5 breached in one household. The applied methodology was highly successful at modelling concentrations for all the houses (R2≥ 0.983), finding that across the houses the I/O (indoor to outdoor sources ratio) was the lowest for PM1 (down to 0.08), and greatest for PM10 (up to 4.93). Whilst the sources could not be clearly distinguished further than being outdoors or indoors, the methodology provides clear insights to source variability within and between the monitored houses. These results highlight the importance of monitoring indoor air pollution to improve pollution exposure estimates, as whilst people may live in areas with acceptable ambient air quality, they can be exposed to unhealthy concentrations in their own homes. This method may be applied in future studies for extended periods to investigate the influence of source seasonality on PM concentrations or scaled up to investigate source variability across larger geographical areas.

1104空気調和
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました