e投票の安全性向上に向けた新技術(Making e-voting safer from coercion and vote buying)

ad

2024-12-20 スイス連邦工科大学ローザンヌ校

EPFL(スイス連邦工科大学ローザンヌ校)の研究者たちは、遠隔電子投票(e-voting)における有権者への強制や投票売買のリスクを軽減する新技術を開発し、実地試験を行いました。この技術では、有権者が偽の投票資格情報を作成できる仕組みを導入し、強制者や買収者にこれらの偽情報を提供することで、実際の投票行動を秘匿します。偽の資格情報を用いた投票は無効化され、選挙結果に影響を与えません。研究チームは、米国ボストンで150人の参加者を対象に模擬選挙を実施し、このシステムの有効性を検証しました。この成果は、2024年に開催された第45回IEEEセキュリティとプライバシーシンポジウムで発表されました。

<関連情報>

良心の電子投票: オンライン投票における投票強要と投票買収の認識、および偽クレデンシャルの有用性 E-Vote Your Conscience: Perceptions of Coercion and Vote Buying, and the Usability of Fake Credentials in Online Voting

Louis-Henri Merino, Alaleh Azhir, Haoqian Zhang, Simone Colombo, Bernhard Tellenbach, Vero Estrada-Galiñanes, Bryan Ford
arXiv  Submitted on 18 Apr 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12075

e投票の安全性向上に向けた新技術(Making e-voting safer from coercion and vote buying)

Abstract

Online voting is attractive for convenience and accessibility, but is more susceptible to voter coercion and vote buying than in-person voting. One mitigation is to give voters fake voting credentials that they can yield to a coercer. Fake credentials appear identical to real ones, but cast votes that are silently omitted from the final tally. An important unanswered question is how ordinary voters perceive such a mitigation: whether they could understand and use fake credentials, and whether the coercion risks justify the costs of mitigation. We present the first systematic study of these questions, involving 150 diverse individuals in Boston, Massachusetts. All participants “registered” and “voted” in a mock election: 120 were exposed to coercion resistance via fake credentials, the rest forming a control group. Of the 120 participants exposed to fake credentials, 96% understood their use. 53% reported that they would create fake credentials in a real-world voting scenario, given the opportunity. 10% mistakenly voted with a fake credential, however. 22% reported either personal experience with or direct knowledge of coercion or vote-buying incidents. These latter participants rated the coercion-resistant system essentially as trustworthy as in-person voting via hand-marked paper ballots. Of the 150 total participants to use the system, 87% successfully created their credentials without assistance; 83% both successfully created and properly used their credentials. Participants give a System Usability Scale score of 70.4, which is slightly above the industry’s average score of 68. Our findings appear to support the importance of the coercion problem in general, and the promise of fake credentials as a possible mitigation, but user error rates remain an important usability challenge for future work.

1600情報工学一般
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました