2024-10-30 イリノイ大学アーバナ・シャンペーン校
<関連情報>
- https://aces.illinois.edu/news/new-illinois-study-explores-adoption-robotic-weeding-fight-superweeds
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/agec.12856
ロボットによる除草剤耐性雑草管理: 雑草生態経済モデル Herbicide-resistant weed management with robots: A weed ecological–economic model
Chengzheng Yu, Madhu Khanna, Shady S. Atallah, Saurajyoti Kar, Muthukumar Bagavathiannan, Girish Chowdhary
Agricultural Economics Published: 02 October 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12856
Abstract
The heavy reliance on herbicides for weed control has led to an increase in resistant weeds in the United States. Robotic weed control is emerging as an alternative technology for removing weeds mechanically using artificial intelligence. We develop an integrated weed ecological and economic dynamic (I-WEED) model to examine the biophysical and economic drivers of adopting robotic weed management and simulate the optimal timing and intensity of robotic adoption within and across growing seasons. We specify a cohort-based weed growth model that relates yield damages to effective weed density and treats the susceptibility of weeds to herbicides as a renewable resource that can be regenerated by using mechanical weeding robots, due to a fitness cost that makes resistant weeds less prolific. Compared to myopic weed management which ignores resistance development, forward-looking management leads to earlier adoption of robots and treating robots as complements instead of substitutes to herbicides. This weed management results in adopting fewer robots, deploying robots on a smaller portion of the land, higher profitability, and lower yield loss in the long run, relative to myopic management. Counterintuitively, myopic management leads to a lower resistance level through its higher robot adoption intensity. We also find that a lower level of initial weed seed resistance and/or a higher fitness cost result in a higher level of resistance because they create incentives for farmers to delay the adoption of robotic weed control. Our analysis shows the importance of jointly considering the interactions between weed ecology and economics in analyzing the incentives and effects of robotic weed management on weed resistance.