サメの個体数減少と漁業の影響を調査 (Sharks are dying at alarming rates, mostly due to fishing. Retention bans may help)

ad

2025-03-17 カリフォルニア大学サンタバーバラ校(UCSB)

カリフォルニア大学サンタバーバラ校の研究チームは、世界中のサメの約3分の1が絶滅の危機に瀕しており、その主な原因が漁業による捕獲であることを明らかにしました。 特に、漁業での混獲による死亡率が高く、小型種や深海性の種、常に遊泳し続ける必要がある種で顕著でした。政策シミュレーションの結果、捕獲後の放流を義務付ける「保持禁止措置」は、サメの死亡率を平均で3倍減少させる効果があるものの、既に過剰漁獲されている種に対しては、持続可能なレベルまでの死亡率低下には不十分であることが示されました。研究者たちは、サメの個体数を保護するためには、放流義務化だけでなく、漁獲制限や生息域の保護など、複数の管理戦略を組み合わせる必要があると指摘しています。

<関連資料>

捕獲禁止は有益だがサメの乱獲を止めるには不十分 Retention Bans Are Beneficial but Insufficient to Stop Shark Overfishing

Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Alicia M. Caughman, Nidhi G. D’Costa, Sara Orofino, Echelle S. Burns, Laurenne Schiller, Boris Worm, Darcy Bradley
First published: 03 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12892

サメの個体数減少と漁業の影響を調査 (Sharks are dying at alarming rates, mostly due to fishing. Retention bans may help)

ABSTRACT

Sharks are among the most threatened groups of exploited fishes, comprising common bycatch across many fisheries. Management efforts intended to safeguard threatened species have increasingly focused on retention bans to reduce bycatch mortality. However, the population effects of such measures remain unevaluated across species. We combined available data from 160 studies providing estimates of at-vessel or post-release mortality for 147 taxa caught by different fishing gears to create random-forest regression models and predict mortality rates for 341 shark species incidentally captured by longlines or gillnets. Smaller-bodied species inhabiting shallow waters were more likely to suffer at-vessel mortality compared to their deep-water counterparts, for which post-release mortality was more likely to occur. We then used results for longlines to simulate the effect of retention bans in reducing fishing mortality to sustainable levels. Our metric consists of the ratio between the proportion of each species’ population caught and discarded (PMAX) under a retention ban divided by the fishing mortality (F) predicted to achieve maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Our calculations show that a retention ban yielded an average ~ three-fold higher PMAX compared to FMSY, with 18% of the species having PMAX/FMSY < 2, 72.3% having 2 < PMAX/FMSY < 5, and 9.7% having PMAX/FMSY > 5. For threatened species, median PMAX/FMSY = 2.28 and non-threatened ones had median PMAX/FMSY = 2.77. Our study shows that retention bans could reduce shark mortality, but must be combined with additional measures to stop overfishing, especially for low-productivity species.

1400水産一般
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました