持続可能性の変革における構造変化の影響を研究者はどのように測定できるか?(How Can Researchers Measure the Impact of Structural Changes on Sustainability Transformations?)

ad

2025-01-14 ドイツ・サステナビリティ研究所(IASS)

持続可能性の変革における構造変化の影響を研究者はどのように測定できるか?(How Can Researchers Measure the Impact of Structural Changes on Sustainability Transformations?)
© istock/wdstock
Transforming lifestyles through structural change: Paving the way for sustainable consumption and vibrant public spaces.

RIFSポツダムの研究は、持続可能な消費やライフスタイルへの構造的変化の影響を測定する方法を提示しました。経済、政治、社会、技術の構造が行動変容に与える役割を評価するため、EUが資金提供した6つの国際プロジェクトの知見を基に、多様な測定手法が比較されました。結果、構造変化の影響を定量化する方法は一部で限界があるものの、政策立案に重要な指標を提供できると示されました。この研究は、持続可能な社会への変革を推進するための科学的基盤を強化します。

<関連情報>

持続可能な消費とライフスタイル研究における構造変化の影響の評価 Assessing the impact of structural change in sustainable consumption and lifestyles research

Doris Fuchs,Ariane Debourdeau,Elisabeth Dütschke,Frances Fahy,Giulia Garzon,Benjamin Kirchler,Christian A. Klöckner, and Marlyne Sahakian
Consumption and Society  Published:07 Oct 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/27528499Y2024D000000033

Abstract

Scientific evidence highlights the pivotal role for structural change in pursuit of the sustainability transformation. A particular challenge for research on structural aspects of sustainable consumption and lifestyles, however, is the assessment of their impact. Especially quantifying the impact of structural change remains a serious problem. While some forms of structural change can be quantified, like the rate of building renovations, changes in the energy mix at the production level, or trends in access to health care or education, the impact of other changes such as societal narratives about wellbeing, political campaigns on energy technologies or policies, or the abandonment of the growth paradigm defy easy quantification. This article aims to shed light on potential avenues for quantitatively assessing the impact of structural change drawing on insights gained by a group of international and interdisciplinary research consortia funded by the European Union in the area of sustainable consumption, citizenship, and lifestyles research. It delineates strengths and weaknesses of different approaches, foci and blindspots of associated data types. Thereby, it highlights fundamental decisions that need to be made in research designs, but also important aspects to consider in the interpretation of results. Finally, the article highlights the particular challenges related to assessing the impact of deep political and ideational structures.

Key messages

  • Importance of analysing impact of structures in sustainable consumption and lifestyles research.
  • Challenges involved in quantitative assessments.
  • Different methods and data types allow recognition of different structures.
  • Fundamental challenges remain with respect to assessment of particularly powerful political and ideational structures.
1901環境保全計画
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました