干ばつのときアマゾンのどの地域が気候変動に最も脆弱かを地図化(When in drought: Researchers map which parts of the Amazon are most vulnerable to climate change)

ad

2024-06-19 アリゾナ大学

2005年のアマゾンの大干ばつで、サテライト画像では緑化が進んでいる一方、現地では植物が茶色く変色し一部が枯れているという矛盾が発見されました。最新の研究によれば、干ばつ時の反応はアマゾンの地域ごとに異なることが原因であることが判明しました。南部では浅い地下水にアクセスできる木が緑化し、深い水域では枯れる傾向があり、北部では根が深く環境に適応した木が耐えられることが分かりました。この地域差の理解は保護策の決定や気候変動予測に役立ちます。

<関連情報>

アマゾン森林の生物地理学は干ばつに対する回復力と脆弱性を予測する Amazon forest biogeography predicts resilience and vulnerability to drought

Shuli Chen,Scott C. Stark,Antonio Donato Nobre,Luz Adriana Cuartas,Diogo de Jesus Amore,Natalia Restrepo-Coupe,Marielle N. Smith,Rutuja Chitra-Tarak,Hongseok Ko,Bruce W. Nelson & Scott R. Saleska
Nature  Published:19 June 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07568-w

干ばつのときアマゾンのどの地域が気候変動に最も脆弱かを地図化(When in drought: Researchers map which parts of the Amazon are most vulnerable to climate change)

Abstract

Amazonia contains the most extensive tropical forests on Earth, but Amazon carbon sinks of atmospheric CO2 are declining, as deforestation and climate-change-associated droughts1,2,3,4 threaten to push these forests past a tipping point towards collapse5,6,7,8. Forests exhibit complex drought responses, indicating both resilience (photosynthetic greening) and vulnerability (browning and tree mortality), that are difficult to explain by climate variation alone9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Here we combine remotely sensed photosynthetic indices with ground-measured tree demography to identify mechanisms underlying drought resilience/vulnerability in different intact forest ecotopes18,19 (defined by water-table depth, soil fertility and texture, and vegetation characteristics). In higher-fertility southern Amazonia, drought response was structured by water-table depth, with resilient greening in shallow-water-table forests (where greater water availability heightened response to excess sunlight), contrasting with vulnerability (browning and excess tree mortality) over deeper water tables. Notably, the resilience of shallow-water-table forest weakened as drought lengthened. By contrast, lower-fertility northern Amazonia, with slower-growing but hardier trees (or, alternatively, tall forests, with deep-rooted water access), supported more-drought-resilient forests independent of water-table depth. This functional biogeography of drought response provides a framework for conservation decisions and improved predictions of heterogeneous forest responses to future climate changes, warning that Amazonia’s most productive forests are also at greatest risk, and that longer/more frequent droughts are undermining multiple ecohydrological strategies and capacities for Amazon forest resilience.

1300森林一般
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました