2025-03-18 ミシガン大学
Illustration by study coauthor Jennifer Kalejs shows synthesis of ecosystem changes over successional time. Image courtesy: Jennifer Kalejs
＜関連情報＞
- https://news.umich.edu/time-is-not-the-driving-influence-of-forest-carbon-storage-u-m-study-finds/
- https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70001
北温帯林における生態系遷移に伴う炭素循環： その制御と管理への影響 Carbon cycling across ecosystem succession in a north temperate forest: Controls and management implications
Lucas E. Nave, Christopher M. Gough, Cameron Clay, Fernanda Santos, Jeff W. Atkins, Sonja E. Benjamins-Carey, Gil Bohrer, Buck T. Castillo, Robert T. Fahey …
Ecological Applications Published: 24 February 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70001
Abstract
Despite decades of progress, much remains unknown about successional trajectories of carbon (C) cycling in north temperate forests. Drivers and mechanisms of these changes, including the role of different types of disturbances, are particularly elusive. To address this gap, we synthesized decades of data from experimental chronosequences and long-term monitoring at a well-studied, regionally representative field site in northern Michigan, USA. Our study provides a comprehensive assessment of changes in above- and belowground ecosystem components over two centuries of succession, links temporal dynamics in C pools and fluxes with underlying drivers, and offers several conceptual insights to the field of forest ecology. Our first advance shows how temporal dynamics in some ecosystem components are consistent across severe disturbances that reset succession and partial disturbances that slightly modify it: both of these disturbance types increase soil N availability, alter fungal community composition, and alter growth and competitive interactions between short-lived pioneer and longer-lived tree taxa. These changes in turn affect soil C stocks, respiratory emissions, and other belowground processes. Second, we show that some other ecosystem components have effects on C cycling that are not consistent over the course of succession. For example, canopy structure does not influence C uptake early in succession but becomes important as stands develop, and the importance of individual structural properties changes over the course of two centuries of stand development. Third, we show that in recent decades, climate change is masking or overriding the influence of community composition on C uptake, while respiratory emissions are sensitive to both climatic and compositional change. In synthesis, we emphasize that time is not a driver of C cycling; it is a dimension within which ecosystem drivers such as canopy structure, tree and microbial community composition change. Changes in those drivers, not in forest age, are what control forest C trajectories, and those changes can happen quickly or slowly, through natural processes or deliberate intervention. Stemming from this view and a whole-ecosystem perspective on forest succession, we offer management applications from this work and assess its broader relevance to understanding long-term change in other north temperate forest ecosystems.
