山火事煙への人間反応を分析し政策立案へ応用(Learning how we respond to wildfire smoke to help inform policy and programs)

2026-01-28 ミシガン大学

米国のUniversity of Michiganの研究チームは、山火事由来の煙(wildfire smoke)に人々がどのように行動で対応しているかを分析し、政策立案や公衆衛生対策に役立つ知見を示した。調査では、大気汚染データと人々の行動データを組み合わせ、煙の濃度上昇に伴い屋外活動を控える、マスクを使用する、屋内に留まるなどの行動変化が確認された。一方で、社会経済状況や地域差により対応には大きなばらつきがあり、必ずしも健康リスクを十分に回避できていない集団も存在した。研究は、実際の行動を踏まえた情報提供や支援策が、山火事煙による健康被害軽減に不可欠であることを示している。

山火事煙への人間反応を分析し政策立案へ応用(Learning how we respond to wildfire smoke to help inform policy and programs)
Smoke from the Bobcat Fire in the San Gabriel Mountains in California in 2020. Image credit: NASA

<関連情報>

山火事の煙に対する人間の行動反応の体系的レビュー A systematic review of human behavioral response to wildfire smoke

Caroline Beckman, Isabela Miñana Lovelace, Francisca N Santana, Megan Czerwinski, Sue Anne Bell and Alexandra Paige Fischer
Environmental Research Letters  Published: 5 January 2026
DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ae20ae

Abstract

As climate conditions intensify fire seasons, human exposure to wildfire smoke becomes a more significant concern, posing health risks and disrupting emotional and social well-being. Academic literature exploring how people perceive and respond to wildfire smoke has grown rapidly in the past decade. We conducted this systematic review with three objectives: to characterize the topical, geographic, and disciplinary focus of existing research, examine the application of established behavioral theories to smoke protection behaviors, and identify emergent themes and research gaps. Following PRISMA standards, we systematically reviewed papers focusing on individual-level human perception or behavioral responses to wildfire smoke events. We extracted information on eight psychosocial constructs across three levels: intrapersonal (cognitive processes: emotions, threat appraisal, coping appraisal), interpersonal (social influences: social networks, social norms), and contextual factors (past experience, access to information, demographic attributes). Our review of 39 studies reveals an emerging field concentrated in the Western US and dominated by public health perspectives. Only ten studies employed explicit theoretical models. We found complex relationships between psychosocial constructs: while people generally recognize smoke as threatening, the relationship between threat perception and protective action remains complex, with mixed findings regarding past experience and coping appraisal. Social networks play a paradoxical role, providing crucial support during smoke events while being disrupted by smoke-induced isolation that prevents normal social gathering. Social norms around smoke protection remain underexplored. Socially vulnerable populations are underrepresented despite facing heightened exposure risks. We identify significant research gaps regarding emotional responses, social norms, and community-level interventions. Enhanced understanding of wildfire smoke responses can improve interventions and policies to promote public health and community adaptation to wildfire smoke.

1902環境測定
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました