湿地は完全に冠水しなくても最大の気候便益を生む (Wetlands do not need to be flooded to provide the greatest climate benefit)

2026-01-29 コペンハーゲン大学(UCPH)

デンマーク・コペンハーゲン大学の研究チームは、湿地が最大の気候緩和効果を発揮するために、必ずしも恒常的に冠水している必要はないことを明らかにした。従来、湿地再生では水位を高く保つことで二酸化炭素排出を抑制できると考えられてきたが、本研究は水位管理が不適切な場合、メタン排出が増加し、気候効果が相殺される可能性を示した。研究者らは、土壌条件や植生、水位変動を詳細に分析し、周期的な乾湿の変化を伴う湿地でも温室効果ガスの正味排出を低く抑えられることを確認した。この結果は、農地や放棄地を湿地として再生する際、必ずしも全面的な水没を伴わない柔軟な管理手法が有効であることを示唆している。本研究は、湿地保全と気候変動対策を両立させる実践的な土地利用戦略に新たな科学的根拠を提供する。

湿地は完全に冠水しなくても最大の気候便益を生む (Wetlands do not need to be flooded to provide the greatest climate benefit)
New knowledge is based on measurements and modeling in Maglemosen, a wetland located 20 kilometers north of Copenhagen, which has been undisturbed for more than 100 years and in many ways represents a typical Danish wetland with peat soils. Photo: Bo Elberling

<関連情報>

最適化された湿地再湿潤戦略は、地下水位の変動に対するメタン、二酸化炭素、酸素の反応を制御できる Optimized wetland rewetting strategies can control methane, carbon dioxide, and oxygen responses to water table fluctuations

Bingqian Zhao,Wenxin Zhang,Peiyan Wang,Adrian Gustafson,Christian J. Jørgensen & Bo Elberling
Communications Earth & Environment  Published:09 January 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03163-7

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Abstract

Rewetting is widely promoted as a climate mitigation strategy to preserve soil carbon in drained wetlands, although rewetting may enhance methane production and corresponding emissions. The increase in methane emissions following rewetting might be underestimated without considering near-surface methane oxidation under a fluctuating water table. Here, we refined the methane module in Lund-Potsdam-Jena General Ecosystem Simulator with high-affinity methane oxidation and oxygen parameterization involving water table fluctuations. During 2007-2023, the Danish temperate wetland site functioned as a carbon dioxide sink (−41 gC-CO2m-2yr⁻1) and a methane source (0.71 gC-CH4m⁻2yr⁻1), with significant declines in seasonal amplitudes of methane flux, net ecosystem exchange, and gross primary productivity. Scenario analysis shows maintaining a stable water table at 9 cm depth offers the optimal trade-off between carbon sequestration and methane release. Our findings reduce the uncertainty in wetland methane estimates under climate change and highlight the importance of site-specific rewetting strategies to optimize mitigation efforts.

1901環境保全計画
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました